PDF] Performance Comparison of the AES Submissions

This paper compares the performance of the leading AES candidates on a variety of common platforms: 32-bit CPUs, 64- bit CPUs, cheap 8-bit smart-card CPUs, and dedicated hardware. The principal goal guiding the design of any encryption algorithm must be security. In the real world, however, performance and implementation cost are always of concern. Making the assumption that the major AES candidates are secure (a big assumption, to be sure, but one that is best dealt with in another paper), the most important properties the algorithms will be judged on will be the performance and cost of implementation. In this paper, we will completely ignore security. Instead, we will compare the performance of the leading AES candidates on a variety of common platforms: 32-bit CPUs, 64-bit CPUs, cheap 8-bit smart-card CPUs, and dedicated hardware. For each platform, we first make some general observations on the performance issues for each of the platforms, then compare the various AES candidates, and finally look at the specific issues for each of the candidates.

PDF) Performance Comparison of the AES Submissions

PDF) Evaluating the performance of Symmetric Key Algorithms: AES

Applied Sciences, Free Full-Text

Cryptography, Free Full-Text

Guidance on the Indicator Tracking Table

A Performance Comparison of Data Encryption Algorithms

Comparing Performance of JavaScript Cryptography Libraries

File encryption performance comparison among AES and AES with OTP

PDF] Performance Comparison of the AES Submissions

Comparative performance analysis of AES encryption algorithm for

PDF) A Comparative Study on AES 128 BIT AND AES 256 BIT

A reconfigurable and compact subpipelined architecture for AES

PDF) Analysis and Comparison between AES and DES Cryptographic

PDF] AN IMPROVED AES S-BOX AND ITS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS